21/xsl/MobileMenu.xsltmobileNave880e1541/WorkArea//http://rsna.org/TwoColumnWireframe.aspx?pageid=3799&ekfxmen_noscript=1&ekfxmensel=falsefalsetruetruetruefalsefalse10-18.0.0.0730truefalse
  •  
     
    • QIBA Protocols and Profiles

    • PROFILE IMPLEMENTATION FEEDBACK PROCESS
      Current Profiles Under Development
       

      QIBA Profile: DCE-MRI Quantification v1.0 (Publicly Reviewed Version)  

      • (Citation reference)  DCE-MRI Technical Committee. DCE-MRI Quantification Profile, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. Version 1.0. Publicly Reviewed Version. QIBA, July 1, 2012. Available from: RSNA.ORG/QIBA 

      QIBA Profile: CT Tumor Volume Change v2.2 (Publicly Reviewed Version)  

      • (Citation reference) CT Volumetry Technical Committee. CT Tumor Volume Change Profile, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. Version 2.2. Publicly Reviewed Version. QIBA, August 8, 2012. Available from: RSNA.ORG/QIBA   

      QIBA Profile: FDG-PET/CT as an Imaging Biomarker Measuring Response to Cancer Therapy (Publicly Reviewed Version) 

      • (Citation reference)  FDG-PET/CT Technical Committee. FDG-PET/CT as an Imaging Biomarker Measuring Response to Cancer Therapy Profile, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. Version 1.05. Publicly Reviewed Version. QIBA, December 11, 2013. Available from: RSNA.ORG/QIBA  

      Profile Implementation process instructions and feedback form. 

       Note to users - when referencing the above QIBA Profile documents, please use the following format:

      Specific QIBA Tech Ctte. * Specific Profile Title, * Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. * Version. * Profile Stage. * QIBA, * Date. * Available from: URL 

      What is a QIBA Profile?

      A Profile is a document used to organize and record the results of the collaborative work by QIBA participants.  

      A Profile is a document used to organize and record the results of the collaborative work by QIBA participants.  

      A Profile consists of one or more Claims and associated Details.

      • Claims: tell a user what quantitative results can be achieved by following the Profile.
      • Details:
        • tell a vendor what must be implemented in their product; and
        • tell a user what procedures are necessary.
         

      The process specifies what to achieve, rather than how to achieve it. 

      For each biomarker, QIBA Modality Committees initially determine what Profiles to pursue and what key scientific precursor questions and concepts need validation. The Committee then coordinates the research and consensus discussions to achieve resolution of the issues.

      This diagram illustrates the inter-related activities which are pursued in Profile development.

       

       QIBA Profile Image 1 

      The goal is to establish processes and Profiles that will lead to acceptance of quantitative imaging biomarkers by the imaging community, clinical trial industry, and regulatory agencies as proof of biology, proof of changes in pathophysiology, and surrogate end-points for changes in the health status of patients. The process addresses obstacles faced by suppliers seeking to commercialize imaging biomarker tests.  This should lead to wider availability and utilization of these imaging biomarkers.
       

      Profile Activities 
       

      CLINICAL CONTEXT 

      The clinical context is defined by ad-hoc sub-committees of treating physicians, radiologists, and medical physicists who start by defining the clinical context (e.g., disease staging, clinical manifestations, etc.), determine what biomarkers to pursue, and then for each biomarker, determine what Profiles to pursue.

      PROFILE CLAIMS 

       QIBA Profile Image 2 

       

      Profile claims are defined by the ad-hoc disease sub-committees, by characterizing the currently accepted standard (e.g., RECIST), stating how the new imaging biomarker will do better, and adopting a statistically rigorous framework.

      The results are recorded in the Profile that outlines the various claims made for the new biomarker, both in terms of science as well as supporting issues such as interoperability or system support issues relevant to the performance of the biomarker.

      Examples: 

      Claim #1 (CT volumetry): A measured volume change of more than 30% for a tumor provides at least a 95% probability that there is a true volume change;  P(true volume change > 0% | measured volume change >30%) > 95%.

      Claim #2 (DCE-MRI): Quantitative microvascular properties, specifically transfer constant (Ktrans) and blood-normalized initial-area-under-the-gadolinium-concentration curve (IAUGCBN), can be measured from DCE-MRI data obtained at 1.5T using low-molecular-weight extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agents with a 20% within-subject coefficient of variation for solid tumors at least 2 cm in diameter. 
       
      GROUNDWORK 

      Groundwork activities include but are not limited to:

      • Quality control metrics
      • Rationale for covariates (e.g., patient preparation)
      • Software version tracking
      • Determination of performance claims (e.g., decide on what limits of variability to include in a claim.)

       

      PROFILE DETAILS 

      Profile Details bring together the results of the previous three activities (i.e., statements of Clinical Context, Profile Claims and Groundwork), to specify what must be done in order to achieve the claim, based on the groundwork and for a given clinical context.

      SUMMARY of COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITY 

       QIBA Profile Image 3 

       

       
      What is a QIBA Protocol?  

      A QIBA Protocol is an imaging protocol developed in conjunction with a QIBA Profile, and which follows the UPICT template and conventions. QIBA Protocols describe how clinical trial subjects or patients should be imaged so as to achieve reproducible quantitative endpoints when those tests are performed utilizing systems that meet the specific performance claims stated in the QIBA Profiles. 

      The UPICT Concept:

      To facilitate the development and maintenance of widely acceptable, consistent imaging protocols (including imaging quality control procedures) for use in clinical trials across a range of disease states, anatomic sites, and imaging modalities:

      •  to “improve” the contribution of imaging data in clinical trials, including improved statistical power
      •  while supporting robust case accrual
      •  and decreasing time to study initiation / site activation
      •  to facilitate image data aggregation across trials
      •  to allow the development, optimization, and validation of imaging biomarkers
      •  through the participation of imaging scientists and clinical trialists drawn from the broad range of interested constituencies

      Links to Protocols may be found on the QIBA WIKI at: http://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=Submitted_Protocols 

      The UPICT Library (under development) provides centralized, public access to a pool of protocols for use in Clinical Trials. 
      For more information on UPICT, please visit the QIBA WIKI at: http://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=UPICT 

    We appreciate your comments and suggestions in our effort to improve your RSNA web experience.

    Name (required)

     

    Email Address (required)

     

    Comments (required)

     

     

     

     

    Discounted Dues: Eligible North American Countries 
    Belize
    Costa Rica
    Dominican Republic
    El Salvador
    Grenada
    Guatamala
    Haiti
    Honduras
    Jamaica
    Netherlands Antilles
    Nicaragua
    Panama
    St.Lucia
    St. Vincent & Grenadines
    Country    Country    Country 
    Afghanistan   Grenada   Pakistan
    Albania   Guatemala   Papua New Guinea
    Algeria   Guinea   Paraguay
    Angola   Guinea-Bissau   Peru
    Armenia   Guyana   Phillippines
    Azerbaijan   Haiti   Rwanda
    Bangladesh   Honduras   Samoa
    Belarus   India   Sao Tome & Principe
    Belize   Indonesia   Senegal
    Benin   Iran   Serbia
    Bhutan   Iraq   Sierra Leone
    Bolivia   Jordan   Solomon Islands
    Bosnia & Herzegovina   Jamaica   Somalia
    Botswana   Kenya   South Africa
    Bulgaria   Kiribati   South Sudan
    Burkina Faso   Korea, Dem Rep (North)   Sri Lanka
    Burundi   Kosovo   St Lucia
    Cambodia   Kyrgyzstan   St Vincent & Grenadines
    Cameroon   Laos\Lao PDR   Sudan
    Cape Verde   Lesotho   Swaziland
    Central African Republic   Liberia   Syria
    Chad   Macedonia   Tajikistan
    China   Madagascar   Tanzania
    Colombia   Malawi   Thailand
    Comoros   Maldives   Timor-Leste
    Congo, Dem. Rep.   Mali   Togo
    Congo, Republic of   Marshall Islands   Tonga
    Cote d'Ivoire   Mauritania   Tunisia
    Djibouti   Micronesia, Fed. Sts.   Turkmenistan
    Dominica   Moldova   Tuvalu
    Domicican Republic   Mongolia   Uganda
    Ecuador   Montenegro   Ukraine
    Egypt   Morocco   Uzbekistan
    El Salvador   Mozambique   Vanuatu
    Eritrea   Myanmar   Vietnam
    Ethiopia   Namibia   West Bank & Gaza
    Fiji   Nepal   Yemen
    Gambia, The   Nicaragua   Zambia
    Georgia   Niger   Zimbabwe
    Ghana   Nigeria    

    Legacy Collection 2
    Radiology Logo
    RadioGraphics Logo 
    Tier 1

    • Bed count: 1-400
    • Associate College: Community, Technical, Further Education (UK), Tribal College
    • Community Public Library (small scale): general reference public library, museum, non-profit administration office

    Tier 2

    • Bed count: 401-750
    • Baccalaureate College or University: Bachelor's is the highest degree offered
    • Master's College or University: Master's is the highest degree offered
    • Special Focus Institution: theological seminaries, Bible colleges, engineering, technological, business, management, art, music, design, law

    Tier 3

    • Bedcount: 751-1,000
    • Research University: high or very high research activity without affiliated medical school
    • Health Profession School: non-medical, but health focused

    Tier 4

    • Bed count: 1,001 +
    • Medical School: research universities with medical school, including medical centers

    Tier 5

    • Consortia: academic, medical libraries, affiliated hospitals, regional libraries and other networks
    • Corporate
    • Government Agency and Ministry
    • Hospital System
    • Private Practice
    • Research Institute: government and non-government health research
    • State or National Public Library
    • Professional Society: trade unions, industry trade association, lobbying organization