•  
     
  • News App
  • To:
    From:
    Subject:
    Comment:
    Link:
      
  • Technology Takes Imaging to New Level at London Olympics

    December 01, 2012

    Radiologists who treated athletes at the 2012 London Olympics left with a clear picture of the increasingly critical role the specialty will play in future games.

    Radiologists who worked around the clock treating athletes at the 2012 London Olympics left with a clear picture of the increasingly critical role the specialty will play in providing imaging services to competitors at future Olympic Games.

    Advances in state-of-the-art technology and imaging techniques have propelled radiology into a central role on the medical teams working to treat athletes and return them to their sport as quickly as possible, said Philip O’Connor, M.D., director of the NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Imaging Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England.

    “Radiology is not only essential to medical services for the Olympics, it’s likely that radiologists will become incorporated into the medical teams that some of the larger countries take to future games,” Dr. O’Connor said.

    Dr. O’Connor served as imaging leader for a team of about 100 volunteers including sports radiologists, radiographers and radiographic assistants who operated MR, CT and ultrasound scanners and X-ray equipment in the Olympic Village Polyclinic sponsored by GE Healthcare. In terms of sheer output, radiology dramatically increased its role since the 2008 Bejiing Olympics, Dr. O’Connor said.

    Radiologists performed more than 800 MR imaging exams, 400 ultrasound, 372 X-ray, and 80 CT exams during the London Games. By the end of the closing ceremony, radiologists had performed more than 1,400 imaging exams in all—twice the number of the 2008 Olympics, Dr. O’Connor said.

    “The workload was huge, with scanners running constantly from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m.,” said Dr. O’Connor, who spent nine weeks in London serving as the only full-time Olympic radiologist for the games, which hosted 10,000-plus athletes from 200 countries.

    Along with the satisfaction gained from aiding athletes, radiologists’ Olympics experiences will also serve as the basis of future research. A diagnostic and therapeutic impact study conducted at the games will be used for a series of research papers, as well as lectures for the Royal College of Radiologists, the British Institute of Radiology and the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) technologists section, Dr. O’Connor said.

    Dr. O’Connor also worked with British Journal of Radiology Editor Prof. Charles Hutchinson, M.D., to develop a special Olympic section of the August 2012 issue of the journal highlighting the roles of radiologists, radiographers and clinical staff. (See Web Extras).

    Portable Ultrasound, Electronic Health Records Aid Athletes

    Since the last Olympics, advances in state-of-the-art medical technology allowed radiologists to diagnose potential injuries earlier and monitor treatment more efficiently—a huge asset for imagers and athletes alike.

    Equipment such as handheld ultrasound and flat-panel detectors for radiographic systems have improved dramatically in terms of size, portability, wireless capabilities and price, according to Lori Webb, a clinical analyst with MD Buyline, which provides healthcare organizations with objective, evidence-based information for their acquisition and management of medical technology.

    Webb, who worked in sports medicine as a contracted radiographer for an NFL team in the late 1990s, found “the depth and breadth of imaging modalities” in the Olympic Village Polyclinic to be “a far cry from the portable X-ray unit, film processor and view box I used 16 years ago during the Atlanta Falcons’ home games.

    “Despite this, the goal has remained the same,” Webb said. “Get the medical imaging procedure done quickly and accurately, get the results to the right people and get the athlete back in the game if the results support that decision.”

    David Connell, M.D., a musculoskeletal radiologist at the Olympic Park Medical Centre in Melbourne, Australia, who treated many gold medalists at the London games, said the athletes were surprised by the quality of the imaging equipment.

    “For many athletes, this was the first time they had experienced this level of imaging sophistication,” Dr. Connell said. “Many teams were bowled over by the high-quality service.”

    The 2012 games also ushered in the transition to electronic medical records, marking the first time in Olympic history that paper charts were not used for U.S. athletes. Electronic imaging records were stored in the GE Healthcare Centricity Practice Solution, a RIS/PACS system that is in compliance with meaningful use guidelines.

    “Using electronic medical records has given radiologists and other physicians simultaneous access to the athletes’ medical information when needed, enhancing their ability to care for the athletes,” said Webb.

    Radiologists Learn Value of Teamwork

    The intensity of the polyclinic and sheer number of athletes and ailments treated by the radiologists taught volunteers a number of lessons on everything from techniques to teamwork.

    “Seeing such a broad spectrum of injuries was amazing,” Dr. O’Connor said. “And seeing the injuries that athletes could compete with was amazing. “We also got a real feel for sport-specific injuries, having days when we would see four or five of the exact same injury because a new sport had come into the program,” he added. “For example, during the judo and weightlifting, we saw 14 acute ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow.”

    Although they’re not athletes, Dr. O’Connor said he also realized “how well radiologists can get on when they come together as a team with a common non-competitive aim.”

    “Radiologists acted in a volunteer capacity and helped engender a lot of goodwill to the spirit of the games,” Dr. Connell agreed.

    Web Extras

    Olympics Featured in British Journal of Radiology

    A special Olympic feature in the August 2012 issue of British Journal of Radiology examines the impact and uses of imaging and radiology in sports medicine. Developed by BJR Editor Prof. Charles Hutchinson, M.D., and Philip O’Connor, M.D., lead imager for the London 2012 Olympics, the issue features research on imaging muscle injury in the elite athlete, radiological interventions for soft tissue injuries and tendon and ligament imaging, among other topics.

    To read an Olympic special feature editorial by Prof. Hutchinson and Dr. O’Connor and access abstracts of the research, go to bjr.birjournals.org/content/85/1016.toc.

    black arrowhead 9 x 10 GIF Contact the editor 

    Webb
    Webb
    Connoll
    Connoll
    Olympics
    Radiologists at the 2012 London Olympics performed more than 1,400 imaging exams in all—twice the number of the 2008 Olympics, said Philip O’Connor, M.D., (above) imaging leader for a team of about 100 volunteers. Dr. O’Connor, who spent nine weeks in London, enjoyed a rare bit of downtime between scans.

We appreciate your comments and suggestions in our effort to improve your RSNA web experience.

Name (required)

 

Email Address (required)

 

Comments (required)

 

 

 

 

Discounted Dues: Eligible North American Countries 
Belize
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatamala
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Netherlands Antilles
Nicaragua
Panama
St.Lucia
St. Vincent & Grenadines
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Botswana
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo, Dem. Rep.
Congo, Republic of
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Dominica
Domicican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Fiji
Gambia, The
Georgia
Ghana
Grenada
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Jordan
Jamaica
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kosovo*
Kyrgyzstan
Lao PDR
Laos

 

Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Maldives
Mali
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
Moldova
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Pakistan
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Phillippines
Rwanda
Samoa
Sao Tome & Principe
Senegal
Somalia
South Africa
Sri Lanka
St Lucia
St Vincent & Grenadines
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Syria
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Tunisia
Turkmenistan
Uganda
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vietnam
West Bank & Gaza
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

 

Tier 1

  • Bed count: 1-400
  • Associate College: Community, Technical, Further Education (UK), Tribal College
  • Community Public Library (small scale): general reference public library, museum, non-profit administration office

Tier 2

  • Bed count: 401-750
  • Baccalaureate College or University: Bachelor's is the highest degree offered
  • Master's College or University: Master's is the highest degree offered
  • Special Focus Institution: theological seminaries, Bible colleges, engineering, technological, business, management, art, music, design, law

Tier 3

  • Bedcount: 751-1 000
  • Research University: high or very high research activity without affiliated medical school
  • Health Profession School: non-medical, but health focused

Tier 4

  • Bed count: 1,001 +
  • Medical School: research universities with medical school, including medical centers

Tier 5

  • Consortia: academic, medical libraries, affiliated hospitals, regional libraries and other networks
  • Corporate
  • Government Agency and Ministry
  • Hospital System
  • Private Practice
  • Research Institute: government and non-government health research
  • State or National Public Library
  • Professional Society: trade unions, industry trade association, lobbying organization