• Vignette 2: Partner Relationships

  • Answer to Question 1

    There are two sources of error in this case. The first is the response of the physician interpreting the exam, and the second is the reality that the referring office is not sending the comparison exams in a timely manner. Unless both errors are remedied, the problem will not be fixed over the long term.

    Answer A (be quiet and refrain from taking action, since this matter is not your responsibility) is the least confrontational option, but it does nothing to prevent the problem from happening again.

    Answer B (say nothing to your partner, but express your concerns to a more senior partner about the phone behavior you witnessed) is acceptable but undermines the trust that one partner should have with another partner. Unless your partner knows that you feel the response was inappropriate, he/she will not modify his/her behavior when you are present. In particular, if the less desired behavior appears to represent an isolated incident, peer involvement is usually less obtrusive and may be similarly effective in behavior modification as compared to intervention by a higher authority. 

    Answer D (call the office of the referring physician, and offer an apology on behalf of your practice) may be a good marketing response but could actually exacerbate the problem of not having the comparison exams in a timely manner.

    Answer E (wait a few days to let the issue cool down, and then speak to your partner about your concerns about his/her phone behavior) may be acceptable if there is extreme tension and high emotions at the time of the call. However, in general, it is better to address the work problem immediately, while it is fresh in everyone’s mind. 

    Therefore, the correct answer to Question 1 is C (speak with your partner in private as soon as possible after the call to express your concerns about his/her phone behavior, and encourage the partner to speak to the leadership of the practice regarding his/her concerns about the referring office), which is the most effective response. Encouraging your partner to approach your practice’s leadership with his/her concerns (before leadership approaches your partner) may provide the partner with a greater sense of being a stakeholder in this particular work situation. 



    Return to Intro            Continue
     


      

We appreciate your comments and suggestions in our effort to improve your RSNA web experience.

Name (required)

 

Email Address (required)

 

Comments (required)

 

 

 

 

Discounted Dues: Eligible North American Countries 
Belize
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatamala
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Netherlands Antilles
Nicaragua
Panama
St.Lucia
St. Vincent & Grenadines
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Botswana
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo, Dem. Rep.
Congo, Republic of
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Dominica
Domicican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Fiji
Gambia, The
Georgia
Ghana
Grenada
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Jordan
Jamaica
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kosovo*
Kyrgyzstan
Lao PDR
Laos

 

Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Maldives
Mali
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
Moldova
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Pakistan
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Phillippines
Rwanda
Samoa
Sao Tome & Principe
Senegal
Somalia
South Africa
Sri Lanka
St Lucia
St Vincent & Grenadines
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Syria
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Tunisia
Turkmenistan
Uganda
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vietnam
West Bank & Gaza
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

 

Tier 1

  • Bed count: 1-400
  • Associate College: Community, Technical, Further Education (UK), Tribal College
  • Community Public Library (small scale): general reference public library, museum, non-profit administration office

Tier 2

  • Bed count: 401-750
  • Baccalaureate College or University: Bachelor's is the highest degree offered
  • Master's College or University: Master's is the highest degree offered
  • Special Focus Institution: theological seminaries, Bible colleges, engineering, technological, business, management, art, music, design, law

Tier 3

  • Bedcount: 751-1 000
  • Research University: high or very high research activity without affiliated medical school
  • Health Profession School: non-medical, but health focused

Tier 4

  • Bed count: 1,001 +
  • Medical School: research universities with medical school, including medical centers

Tier 5

  • Consortia: academic, medical libraries, affiliated hospitals, regional libraries and other networks
  • Corporate
  • Government Agency and Ministry
  • Hospital System
  • Private Practice
  • Research Institute: government and non-government health research
  • State or National Public Library
  • Professional Society: trade unions, industry trade association, lobbying organization