• Partner Relationships

  • Answer to Question 1

    There are two sources of error in this case. The first is the response of the physician interpreting the exam, and the second is the reality that the referring office is not sending the comparison exams in a timely manner. Unless both errors are remedied, the problem will not be fixed over the long term.

    Answer A (be quiet and refrain from taking action, since this matter is not your responsibility) is the least confrontational option, but it does nothing to prevent the problem from happening again.

    Answer B (say nothing to your partner, but express your concerns to a more senior partner about the phone behavior you witnessed) is acceptable but undermines the trust that one partner should have with another partner. Unless your partner knows that you feel the response was inappropriate, he/she will not modify his/her behavior when you are present. In particular, if the less desired behavior appears to represent an isolated incident, peer involvement is usually less obtrusive and may be similarly effective in behavior modification as compared to intervention by a higher authority. 

    Answer D (call the office of the referring physician, and offer an apology on behalf of your practice) may be a good marketing response but could actually exacerbate the problem of not having the comparison exams in a timely manner.

    Answer E (wait a few days to let the issue cool down, and then speak to your partner about your concerns about his/her phone behavior) may be acceptable if there is extreme tension and high emotions at the time of the call. However, in general, it is better to address the work problem immediately, while it is fresh in everyone’s mind. 

    Therefore, the correct answer to Question 1 is C (speak with your partner in private as soon as possible after the call to express your concerns about his/her phone behavior, and encourage the partner to speak to the leadership of the practice regarding his/her concerns about the referring office), which is the most effective response. Encouraging your partner to approach your practice’s leadership with his/her concerns (before leadership approaches your partner) may provide the partner with a greater sense of being a stakeholder in this particular work situation. 

    Previous            Contbutton

    « Return to Vignettes Table of Contents

    « Return to Professionalism Home Page

We appreciate your comments and suggestions in our effort to improve your RSNA web experience.

Name (required)


Email Address (required)


Comments (required)





Discounted Dues: Eligible North American Countries 
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Netherlands Antilles
St. Vincent & Grenadines
Country    Country    Country 
Afghanistan   Grenada   Pakistan
Albania   Guatemala   Papua New Guinea
Algeria   Guinea   Paraguay
Angola   Guinea-Bissau   Peru
Armenia   Guyana   Phillippines
Azerbaijan   Haiti   Rwanda
Bangladesh   Honduras   Samoa
Belarus   India   Sao Tome & Principe
Belize   Indonesia   Senegal
Benin   Iran   Serbia
Bhutan   Iraq   Sierra Leone
Bolivia   Jordan   Solomon Islands
Bosnia & Herzegovina   Jamaica   Somalia
Botswana   Kenya   South Africa
Bulgaria   Kiribati   South Sudan
Burkina Faso   Korea, Dem Rep (North)   Sri Lanka
Burundi   Kosovo   St Lucia
Cambodia   Kyrgyzstan   St Vincent & Grenadines
Cameroon   Laos\Lao PDR   Sudan
Cape Verde   Lesotho   Swaziland
Central African Republic   Liberia   Syria
Chad   Macedonia   Tajikistan
China   Madagascar   Tanzania
Colombia   Malawi   Thailand
Comoros   Maldives   Timor-Leste
Congo, Dem. Rep.   Mali   Togo
Congo, Republic of   Marshall Islands   Tonga
Cote d'Ivoire   Mauritania   Tunisia
Djibouti   Micronesia, Fed. Sts.   Turkmenistan
Dominica   Moldova   Tuvalu
Domicican Republic   Mongolia   Uganda
Ecuador   Montenegro   Ukraine
Egypt   Morocco   Uzbekistan
El Salvador   Mozambique   Vanuatu
Eritrea   Myanmar   Vietnam
Ethiopia   Namibia   West Bank & Gaza
Fiji   Nepal   Yemen
Gambia, The   Nicaragua   Zambia
Georgia   Niger   Zimbabwe
Ghana   Nigeria    

Legacy Collection 2
Radiology Logo
RadioGraphics Logo 
Tier 1

  • Bed count: 1-400
  • Associate College: Community, Technical, Further Education (UK), Tribal College
  • Community Public Library (small scale): general reference public library, museum, non-profit administration office

Tier 2

  • Bed count: 401-750
  • Baccalaureate College or University: Bachelor's is the highest degree offered
  • Master's College or University: Master's is the highest degree offered
  • Special Focus Institution: theological seminaries, Bible colleges, engineering, technological, business, management, art, music, design, law

Tier 3

  • Bedcount: 751-1,000
  • Research University: high or very high research activity without affiliated medical school
  • Health Profession School: non-medical, but health focused

Tier 4

  • Bed count: 1,001 +
  • Medical School: research universities with medical school, including medical centers

Tier 5

  • Consortia: academic, medical libraries, affiliated hospitals, regional libraries and other networks
  • Corporate
  • Government Agency and Ministry
  • Hospital System
  • Private Practice
  • Research Institute: government and non-government health research
  • State or National Public Library
  • Professional Society: trade unions, industry trade association, lobbying organization